Especially when things are so good.
"For
reasons I have never understood, people like to hear that the world is going to
hell," historian Deirdre N. McCloskey told the New York Times this week.
It's
hard to argue. Despite the record of things getting better for most people most
of the time, pessimism isn't just more common than optimism, it also sounds
smarter. It's intellectually captivating, and paid more attention to than the
optimist who is often viewed as an oblivious sucker.
It's
always been this way. John Stuart Mill wrote 150 years ago: "I have
observed that not the man who hopes when others despair, but the man who
despairs when others hope, is admired by a large class of persons as a sage."
Matt Ridley wrote in his book The Rational Optimist:
If
you say the world has been getting better you may get away with being called
naive and insensitive. If you say the world is going to go on getting better,
you are considered embarrassingly mad. If, on the other hand, you say
catastrophe is imminent, you may expect a McArthur genius award or even the
Nobel Peace Prize.
In
investing, a bull sounds like a reckless cheerleader, while a bear sounds like
a sharp mind who has dug past the headlines - despite the record of the Sensex
rising many folds since inception.
This
goes beyond investing. Those publishing negative book reviews are seen as
smarter and more competent than those giving positive reviews of the same book.
Only pessimism sounds profound. Optimism sounds superficial.
Why?
There's
clearly more at stake with pessimism. Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel Prize for
showing that people respond stronger to loss than gain. It's an evolutionary
shield: "Organisms that treat threats as more urgent than opportunities
have a better chance to survive and reproduce," Kahneman once wrote.
Here
are a few other reasons why pessimism gets so much attention.
1.
Optimism appears oblivious to risks, so by default pessimism looks more
intelligent. But
that's a wrong way to view optimists. Most optimists will tell you things will
get ugly, that we'll have recessions, bear markets, wars, panics, and
pandemics. But they remain optimistic because they set themselves up in
portfolio, career, and disposition to endure those downsides. To the pessimist
a bad event is the end of the story. To the optimist it's a slow chapter in an
otherwise excellent book. The difference between an optimist and a pessimist
often comes down to endurance and time frame.
2.
Pessimism shows that not everything is moving in the right direction, which
helps you rationalize the personal shortcomings we all have. Misery loves company, as they say.
Realizing that things outside your control could be the cause of your own
problems is a comforting feeling, so we're attracted to it.
3.
Pessimism requires action, whereas optimism means staying the course. Pessimism is "SELL, GET OUT,
RUN," which grabs your attention because it's an action you need to take
right now. You don't want to read the article later or skim over the details,
because you might get hurt. Optimism is mostly, "Don't worry, stay the course,
we'll be alright," which is easy to ignore since it doesn't require doing
anything.
4.
Optimism sounds like a sales pitch, while pessimism sounds like someone trying
to help you. In
general, most of the time, optimism is the correct default setting, and
pessimism can be as big a sales pitch as anything - especially if it's around
emotional topics like money and politics.
5.
Pessimists extrapolate present trends without accounting for how reliably
markets adapt. That's
important, because pessimistic views often start with a foundation of rational
analysis, so the warning appears as reasonable as it is scary.
In
2008, environmentalist Lester Brown wrote: "By 2030 China would need 98
million barrels of oil a day. The world is currently producing 85 million
barrels a day and may never produce much more than that. There go the world's
oil reserves."
He's
right; We'll run out of oil in that scenario. But that's not how markets work.
A shortage pushed up oil prices, high prices incentivized producers to come up
with new drilling techniques, and now we have more oil than we know what to do
with. World oil production last year was 96 million barrels - already way above
what he thought was the high mark. Failing to account for markets' ability to
adapt is the cause of death of most pessimist forecasts.
Should
you ever listen to pessimists? Of course. They're the best indication of what's
unsustainable, and thus probably about to change, and thus the soil of what's
to be optimistic about.
No comments:
Post a Comment