Insurance is a key part of every
individual’s financial planning but far too many people are thinking of it as
an investment...
'I invested Rs 2 lakh last year, out of which R80,000 was in insurance.' The genesis of the article you are
reading was this one single sentence in an e-mail that was sent to us recently.
There was nothing unique about this e-mail--we get many every day asking us for
investment advice. The fact that the writer, without any hesitation, considered
insurance to be investment was also not unique. What has really caught our eye
is that we are seeing more and more of this attitude.
An ever-increasing number of people
are ‘investing’ in insurance, driven, no doubt, by the sharply higher amount of
insurance advertising and marketing that they are exposed to. Over the years,
we have been bombarded by insurance pitches at a rate that is far higher than
used to earlier. This is a natural by-product of the competition in the
insurance industry and by itself there is nothing wrong with this.
Whereas earlier, insurance marketing
was driven solely by competition between insurance agents and agents’ own drive
to make more money, today the marketing hype is driven by insurance companies
competing with each other. Insurance advertising in the mass media, which was
almost non-existent once, has grown hugely. By some measures, mass media
advertising of insurance products is around eight times what it used to be
three years ago. On the face of it, there’s nothing wrong with this. After all,
it’s an uncertain world and most people sleep better at night knowing that
they’re well insured. Actually, there is something deeply wrong about the way
the whole activity of insurance is evolving.
Here’s the problem: a bulk of the
money that flows into the insurance companies’ coffers is not payment for
insurance but for what are essentially investment products. Generations of
Indian have been brainwashed by insurance agents into thinking that buying term
insurance is a stupid thing to do.
An insurance agent never mentions term insurance on his own and
if you bring up the topic, he immediately warns you that you will not get
anything back. ‘No benefit’ is the phrase he normally uses. Since you certainly
don’t want to do anything that carries no benefit, your thinking veers towards
policies that supposedly carry a benefit.
This combination of factors--the
business model of insurance selling plus the insurance buyers’ hunger for
‘benefit’ has resulted in a situation where too many otherwise money-savvy
Indians are not thinking clearly about what insurance is, how it is different
from investment and how they should best go about insuring themselves.
To be sure, there are many
superficial similarities between insurance and investment, and this is what
causes the confusion. Loosely speaking, both involve giving money to a
financial service provider in exchange for a future benefit but there the
similarity ends.
Let’s take a systematic,
back-to-the-basics look at what insurance is and how it should be bought and
compare this to investment. The purpose of insurance is to cover the financial
aspect of risk. The risk can be of property, life, health, legal liability and
of many other kinds. The only logical kind of life insurance that makes sense
is term insurance because only in that case are you are insuring against a risk
that is insurable. The moment you buy any other kind of insurance, you are
actually making an investment that is disguised as insurance.
The problem with buying investment
disguised as insurance is that there are many characteristics of insurance that
are most undesirable in investments. Here are some major problems.
Illiquid: Investments ought to be liquid. After all, it’s your money
and if you really need it, you should be able to get your hands on it. However,
the investment part of your insurance policy is locked in for enormous periods
of time. Sure, there are investments like public provident fund and other
tax-saving investments which we recommend. However, those offer a far better
deal in some other way, either in tax exemptions, or in sovereign guarantees or
in the relatively short period of lock-in and often a combination of these. The
investment part of insurance offers moderate returns and decades-long lock-in.
This just doesn’t make sense.
Lack of transparency:
In this regard, the insurance
industry in India just doesn't measure up to the standards that are followed by
the mutual fund industry. There is absolutely no valid reason why you, as an
investor, should have less knowledge about what your insurer is doing with your
money than you have about what your mutual fund is doing with it. Daily NAVs,
change in personnel, procedural rules about justifying investment decisions and
other rules that funds follow need to be imposed on insurance companies as
well.
Cost: Compared to what agents selling mutual funds, Reserve Bank
of India and other bonds and Post Office deposits get, the commissions received
by insurance agents are a scandal. The commissions are enormous. For a
financial product that is supposed to be an investment, this is a shocking .
At the end of the day, these
commissions are probably the strongest argument against investing with an
insurance company. Given what safe investment earns these days, this commission
alone ensures that this ‘investment’ is an incredibly bad deal.
Investment and insurance just don’t
mix.
No comments:
Post a Comment